Roman Roads in Lancashire - Milestones


Lancs Roman Roads

Roman Milestones of Lancashire

Lancashire currently has 9 known milestones with no less than 6 on the route from Ribchester to Lancaster - this was probably Lancashire's most important road linking two major Roman centres so not a surprise. The Lancashire milestones were stone pillars usually cylindrical but not always (Ashton). Some have/had Latin inscriptions and again not always (Cabus). Several are no longer full height but are now just stumps - to be expected after nearly 2000 years. Generally erected when a road was first constructed but we do have at least one example (Stonelands) where the milestone was erected after a road upgrade - see later. A feature of Lancashire milestones is that many of them are not stuffed away in museums but out in the countryside - usually close to their original position and nearby to their Roman road..

The Big Question - were they every mile? The established opinion is no but in Lancashire, with plenty of stone quarries, it would have been perfectly feasible. Taking the Ribchester to Lancaster road with its 6 milestones this represents a 25% survival rate. If 25% are still here 2000 years later how many were there originally? Certainly many more and perhaps all 23 (24 miles needs 23 milestones).

Over 100 inscribed Roman milestones have been recorded in Britain. The current Ordnance Survey Roman Britain map shows just one for Lancashire.

milestones map

 

Note - The location mapping for each milestone is from Lancashire County Council’s Mario website under an Open Government Licence. For those milestones held in Lancaster Museum then the locations shown are where they were (probably) found. For the remainder then the locations shown are where they are to be found now.

 

Ribchester to Lancaster

Stonelands, near Longridge

Dedicated to Emperor Maximian c. 300 AD. The inscription now is barely discernable but was recorded by David Shotter & Patrick Tostevin. It has been re-erected in the garden of Stonelands - apparently upside down but in reality this may well be how it was in later Roman times - see below.

inscription

No distance is recorded or has survived but it would fit with 2 miles (to Ribchester). The authors did not know of this road and reported it as being from the road to Burrow. This would represent a move of 2 miles and obviously it is from this road - a move of metres rather than miles. My thanks are due to Margaret Edwards for providing me a copy of the above report, which set in motion a train of events that lead me to the tracing of the full course of this road.

The date on the milestone of around 300AD implies it was not erected for the original construction of the road, rather an upgrade. That is exactly what appears to be the case. At Stonelands there are two aggers side by side with the western one appearing in by far the best condition and therefore a replacement for the eastern one which had suffered erosion.

Note: this milestone has all the appearance of an "inverted" milestone. The current top is decidedly squarish as is more normal for the base. In all likelihood it would have been the other way up originally with probably an inscription for an earlier Emperor. So rather than obtaining another stone it was easier to turn it upside down and re-carve a new inscription on the new top. Thanks to Bryn Gethin for explaining "inverted" milestones and therefore the odd appearance of this one.

Image: DR

stonelands

 

Garstang - discovered 2024

The route of the Roman road at Garstang I only found in the last 10 years. Lidar shows a very prominent agger approaching the River Wyre at Garstang. Also visible is what looks like bridge training or wing walls on the eastern bank (shown in black). We, Wyre Archaeology, has tried several times to gain permission to investigate what has survived there - a lot appears to have. However, permission has always been refused. Undaunted, my long time collaborator Andy Jackson decided to inspect the western side of the river to see if anything had survived there. What he spotted came as a great surprise. In a garden (exact location cannot be divulged) was the stump of what looked like a Roman milestone - very similar to the others known in the vicinity. It had been found by the garden owner and re-erected in a central position as a garden feature. His recollection was that the stone was found nearer the bottom of the garden and therefore very close to the (interpolated) position of the Roman road ie only metres away from it. Given its typical form and find spot there can be little doubt that it is indeed a Roman milestone. Well done Andy.

Images: Andy Jackson

garstang map

 

Cabus - Toll House

When I had worked out the route of the road across Garstang the penny suddenly dropped as to the nature of the west gate post of the Turnpike Cottage at Cabus. Hiding is full view was a Roman Milestone! It is so typically Roman with a square base and round top. The east gatepost here is totally different and appears banded. It looks like the turnpike trust simply commandeered the Roman milestone for use as a gate post - all they had to do was add a gate stop, visible in the picture. Because of its proximity to the hedge it very difficult to see in summer.

Image: DR

cabus map

 

Forton Crossroads, Forton

This milestone adjacent to Forton Hall was re-erected at Forton Crossroads next to a cross base. Its position now is 200 metres from the Roman road and if originally from Forton Hall then this is a relatively easy move to make in order to place it somewhere where it is clearly visible. Obviously now a stump but is very similar to the Cabus milestone, at least in diameter.

Its current location is at the crossroads but actually just on Stony Lane, which led for many years the belief that Stony Lane was the Roman road to Lancaster. Thanks to Lidar we now know better - the road went via Cockerham.

Image: DR

forton map

 

Ashton, Near Lancaster (2 milestones)

This pair of milestones appear to have been found in the same field in Ashton, one in 1811 (left below) and another in 1834 (right below). We are indebted to W.T. Watkin for recording this and publlishing drawings/engravings. The findspot was described as being ploughed up in a field in Ashton near the canal - that would fit well with a 3 mile distance along the road from Lancaster which is the inscription on the earlier stone. The second stone was recorded as being from the same field. The explanation of two in the same spot is probably one replaced the other. The first one (dedicated to Philip) is crude and is dated to 244-249AD. The second (dedicated to Decius) is grander and dated to 249-251AD. The stones now reside in Lancaster Museum but only the Decius one is on display. Reference: Roman Lancashire by W.T. Watkin. 1883.

forton map

Thanks to Andy Jackson we now have photographs of these milestones following his visit to Lancaster Museum accompanied by museum staff including the head of the department. The Philippo stone had wrongly been catalogued as from Ashton, Great Manchester. We were able to put this right.

Watkin believed he could make out (faintly) that the last line read MPIII. Today that is not possible to verify. But Watkin was looking at the stone on the 1880s when it was outside in the garden of Stodday Hall. His drawing/engraving shows the stone not broken which it now clearly is. One can only assume being in a garden it has suffred more damage and the last line in now illegible. I would go with Watkin's interpretation - the M or N is not another line of text but located in the middle of the stone where mileages were typically positioned. Plus of course now we know where the road was located it definitely must have been been at the 3 mile position. The milestone is currently not on display. Images Andy Jackson.

philippo milestone

Andy also photographed the Decius milestone which is on display. This was found in the same spot but does not record the distance.

Decius milestone

 

Ribchester to Elslack

Barrow Brook, Barrow

Discovered in the mid-1950s by Philip Graystone, author of the Walking Roman Roads series of books. He forwarded details to Ivan Margary who confirmed the likelihood of it being a Roman milestone. Cannot get better provenance than that.

Graystone was excavating the road there at two sections with schoolboys from Blackburn, where he was a head teacher. The stone was found near Barrow Brook and "half-buried". Its condition was "mutilated" but was clearly cylindrical with a diameter of around 12 inches. It was presumably re-erected by Graystone with a suspicion it is upside down. Reference CNWRS, 1996

Image: Philip Graystone

barrow

 

Ribchester to Burrow

Burrow, Overtown

Just before the road from Ribchester reaches Leck Beck then alongside it is the stump of a Roman Milestone. It on the boundary of Burrow and Leck Parishes. The location is shown incorrectly (at the time of writing) in Historic England's entry. The milestone is scheduled as ancient monument no. 1003131.

In 2020 the milestone was badly damaged by verge clearing machinery(?). presumably because the worker did not realise the correct position. A few pieces were knocked off and the stump split in two. it is understood discussions have taken place regarding repairs, which I assume have now been carried out. Thanks to Graham Ransom for bringing this to my attention.

Images: Graham Ransom

burrow

 

Lancaster to Burrow

Caton - Artle Beck Milestone

The find spot was in the vicinity of Milestone Place, Caton. However, historical research by Andrew White recorded that it was found 245 yards upstream of bridge (Contrebis 1992). This has now been confirmed by finding the Roman road on either side of Artle Beck by Andy Jackson and Phillip Crawshaw - see Lancaster to Burrow Roman Road

Translation of the Inscription (RIB 2272); For the Emperor Caesar Trajan Hadrian Augustus, pontifex maximus, with tribunician power, thrice consul, father of his country, from L(…) 4 miles. The milestone is therefore dated to Hadrian ie 119-138AD. Regarding the Roman name for lancaster it is amazing how many suggestions over the years do not begin with L. Antonine Itinerary X would seem to indicate Lancaster was called ALONE - is the A at the beginning an error? The LON bit would fit perfectly with Lonsdale and the River Lune derived from it and of course modern Lancaster.

The distance of 4 miles we now know is correct with the finding of the road's actual route.

The milestone is kept in Lancaster Museum and appears to have had two halves re-joined together. It is on display.

caton

Return to Lancashire Homepage


 

 

 

Last update: September 2024

© David Ratledge